Laws are the tools politicians (and bureaucrats) use to force the people to behave in a certain way. And they have the police to enforce these laws.
In a democratic society it is essential that the laws are the same for all citizens, and applied in the same way for all. Regardless what these laws stipulate, regardless if they are “good” or “bad”. All people should have the same rights (and obligations).
This does not imply that all laws are good. There are plenty of really bad laws. Some are unfair, some are in conflict with fundamental human and civil rights, some are silly, some creates “crimes” without victims and some are plain stupid.
Most people break some laws, most of the time. There are simply too many laws for anyone to have a reasonable grasp of most of them. Some laws we break because we find them unimportant, silly or patronising. And some laws we should break, as they infringe on our fundamental rights.
Laws are always the footprint of the ruling political forces. We have all seen the Internet meme “Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal” (Martin Luther King, Jr.). The fact that something is legal is no guarantee that it is right or reasonable.
In a democratic system, the laws can even be used to undermine or nullify democracy itself. In a democratic, orderly way.
Enter: mass surveillance.
Mass surveillance gives the authorities a way to control that the people obey the laws. All the people. All the laws. All the time. Even really bad laws.
This will create a society where everyone must be looking over the shoulder. A society where you must be careful before you talk. An anxious society.
This might be a classic case of an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object.
We need to talk about this: If we are to live in a mass surveillance society (like it or not), it must be a somewhat relaxed, liberal and tolerant society.
To put it in different words: The ruling classes need to give the people some slack. If not, pressure and tensions will build in a dangerous way – when authorities can control almost everything we do.
But politicians do not abide by any live and let live principles. And they certainly do not plan ro roll back mass surveillance.
/ HAX
You can hardly expect to ask a ruling class who has absolute control over your every move, who knows your every thought, who has records of every word you ever spoke, and who has carte blanche “authority”, and computerized drone strike capability, to terminate your life at any second, to listen to pleas for liberty and reason?
Does the farmer listen to his sheep begging for mercy in their sheep language?
Let’s face it, the soon to be mass surveillance society will be a combination of the bad parts from Brave New World, with the nice parts from 1984.